<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pace Legal  Online Business &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacelegal.com.au/category/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacelegal.com.au</link>
	<description>Practical &#38; Legal Tips For Online Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ISP Liability For Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/isp-liability-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/isp-liability-for-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFACT v iiNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributory copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooper v Universal Music Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital cloud locker service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI v mp3Tunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI v mp3Tunes Germany Cologne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graduated response mechanism copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grokster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grooveshark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HADOPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HanseNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability for copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kazaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability online intermediaries copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newzbin web-block injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newzbin2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlet v SABAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunde Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swiss Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMG v Veoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music Australia v Sharman License Holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom v YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The potential liability of ISPs and other online intermediaries for copyright infringement has been discussed in the context of &#8216;authorisation liability&#8217; in cases relating to deeplinking and framing, a subset of hyperlinking. The liability of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/isp-liability-for-copyright-infringement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/isp-liability-for-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GoDaddy Withdraws Support For SOPA</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/godaddy-withdraws-support-for-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/godaddy-withdraws-support-for-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domain Registrar GoDaddy has announced that it has reversed its support for the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in response to a chorus of disapproval from the broader internet community and calls to boycott the domain name Registrar. Big media &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/godaddy-withdraws-support-for-sopa/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/godaddy-withdraws-support-for-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian ISPs Favour File Sharing Notice Scheme</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/australian-isps-favour-file-sharing-notice-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/australian-isps-favour-file-sharing-notice-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-piracy laws New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Industry Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement notices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery and warning notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education notices copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HADOPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer to peer file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three strikes law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warning notices copyright infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by TorrentFreak, Australia&#8217;s largest Internet Service Providers have advanced a detailed proposal to combat illegal file-sharing. The proposal includes the introduction of a warning letter process not dissimilar to the controversial anti-piracy laws operating in New Zealand.  The &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/australian-isps-favour-file-sharing-notice-scheme/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/australian-isps-favour-file-sharing-notice-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadshow Films Pty Ltd &amp; Ors v iiNet Limited [2011] &#8211; High Court Hears Appeal</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-ors-v-iinet-limited-2011-high-court-hears-appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-ors-v-iinet-limited-2011-high-court-hears-appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[101(1A) Copyright Act (1968) Cth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorisation copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorisation liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indirect copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability online intermediaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moorhouse v University of New South Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadshow Pty Ltd & Ors v iiNet Limited 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s116AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music v Sharman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court has recently heard the Roadshow v iiNet appeal.  (see Roadshow Films Pty Ltd &#38; Ors v iiNet Limited).  The case concerns whether iiNet can be held liable for authorising its users’ copyright infringements. The Court will have to &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-ors-v-iinet-limited-2011-high-court-hears-appeal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/roadshow-films-pty-ltd-ors-v-iinet-limited-2011-high-court-hears-appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Italian Court Finds Yahoo Liable For Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/italian-court-finds-yahoo-liable-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/italian-court-finds-yahoo-liable-for-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About Elly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorisation of copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFA Films EU ecommerce Directive Court of Rome liability of service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo! Italia S.r.l]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brief look at an Italian Court's interpretation of the EU eCommerce Directive rendering Yahoo liable as a caching provider for all links which are capable of reaching websites hosting infringing content once notice of the existence of infringing content is brought to their notice by the rights owner.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/italian-court-finds-yahoo-liable-for-copyright-infringement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/italian-court-finds-yahoo-liable-for-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Photos Stolen For Internet Dating Site</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photo theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos stolen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facemash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating website profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet scraping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lovely-faces.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zuckerberg hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match.com class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership of photos internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft of images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook photos have been stolen from Facebook to populate a prank internet dating site Lovely-Faces.com, demonstrating the vulnerability of user content uploaded to social media websites.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resale Rights Royalties For Visual Artists</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/resale-rights-royalties-for-visual-artists/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/resale-rights-royalties-for-visual-artists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resale right royalties visual artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resale rights royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resale rights royalties scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalties drawings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalties multimedia works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalties painters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalties photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual art royalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discussion of the resale rights royalty scheme for visual artists.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/resale-rights-royalties-for-visual-artists/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/resale-rights-royalties-for-visual-artists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Pornography Sexting Case By Minor To Proceed</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL nude photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiild pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Pornography Protection Act 1995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation and distribution of child pornograpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doe v Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exgfpics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gillet v Procopets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagebeaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in pari delicto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional infliction of emotional stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion upon seclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Bingle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public disclosure of private facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republishing of nude photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submityourex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort of privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Doe v Peterson, a sexting case, the Defendant tried to argue that because Doe had broken the law by creating and distributing child porn images of herself, the law shouldn't assist her. In refusing to entertain this defence the court concluded  that Doe is considered a victim of the child porn statutes and therefore should not be denied the statutory protection  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dickileaks &#8211; Saints and Teenager Arrive At Settlement in Saints Photo Scandal</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-saints-and-teenager-arrive-at-settlement-in-saints-photo-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-saints-and-teenager-arrive-at-settlement-in-saints-photo-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Demetriou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Nettlefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saints girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zac Dawson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The St Kilda Football Club and the teenager girl at the centre of the Saint Kilda photo scandal have arrived at a settlement after engaging in mediation today. The settlement doesn't reflect the sentiments of the teenager as expressed by her heading into the mediation, although being a confidential process, it isn't known exactly what transpired during the negotiations.  St Kilda CEO Michael Nettlefold however expressed the fact that he was pleased with the result and was glad the club was able to offer the girl a few weeks of temporary accommodation to restore some normality to her life.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-saints-and-teenager-arrive-at-settlement-in-saints-photo-scandal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-saints-and-teenager-arrive-at-settlement-in-saints-photo-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dickileaks &#8211; Reputation Management &#8211; &#8216;Remove&#8217; and &#8216;Move On&#8217; &#8211; How To Sanitise A Saint</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-reputation-management-remove-and-move-on-how-to-clean-a-saint/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-reputation-management-remove-and-move-on-how-to-clean-a-saint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL Players Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Lovett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright in images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dickigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godfrey v Demon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Donaghue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbour protection for multiblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbour provisions DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saints girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah galbally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda school girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen milne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zac Dawson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief look at the practise of online reputation management as applied to the St Kilda Football Club who has engaged reputation management specialists to neutralise negative content appearing online in relation to their 'brand'.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-reputation-management-remove-and-move-on-how-to-clean-a-saint/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dickileaks-reputation-management-remove-and-move-on-how-to-clean-a-saint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

