<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pace Legal  Online Business &#187; Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacelegal.com.au/category/patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacelegal.com.au</link>
	<description>Practical &#38; Legal Tips For Online Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Patent Keeps You Safe On The Streets</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/microsoft-patent-keeps-you-safe-on-the-streets/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/microsoft-patent-keeps-you-safe-on-the-streets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Walking Directions Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedestrian Route Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosenberg v Harwood & Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has been granted a Patent titled &#8216;Pedestrian route production&#8216; for its dynamic walking directions to assist pedestrians to navigate to their desired destination in a pedestrian-friendly, expeditious and safe way.  It develops routes, mindful of unsafe crime infested neighbourhoods, &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/microsoft-patent-keeps-you-safe-on-the-streets/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/microsoft-patent-keeps-you-safe-on-the-streets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Patent For Identifying Transient WebPages</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/google-patent-for-identifying-transient-webpages/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/google-patent-for-identifying-transient-webpages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Patent to Identify Transient Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Patents SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updated content SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been awarded a Patent For Identifying Transient Content which is able to identify transient content on webpages. This could refer to any type of content that changes regularly when visitors return to your webpage such as updates which &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/google-patent-for-identifying-transient-webpages/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/google-patent-for-identifying-transient-webpages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Facial Recognition Patent For iPhone</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial Recognition patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy facial recognition software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by Business Insider Apple has filed a patent for a facial recognition system for mobile devices. It is similar to the system in Android phones, however Apple is considering incorporating an option into the software which would recognize a number of faces, detected through the &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Scores Patent Win Over Android</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-scores-patent-win-over-android/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-scores-patent-win-over-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple data tapping patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple tap to call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple v HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventiveness tap to call feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 647 patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITC ruling Apple v HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S International Trade Commission (ITC) has imposed an official import ban on Android and any other phones which violate Apple&#8217;s patent. An ITC Judge was faced with a claim from Apple, accusing Taiwan based handset maker HTC of infringing ten of Apple&#8217;s patents. &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-scores-patent-win-over-android/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-scores-patent-win-over-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Sues Apple Over Patent For Emoticons</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/samsung-sues-apple-over-patent-for-emoticons/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/samsung-sues-apple-over-patent-for-emoticons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung v Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the L.A. Times, the latest spat in a German Court in the patent war between Samsung and Apple is over Samsung&#8217;s patented emoticons. Samsung enjoys ownership of a patent on smartphone use of emoticons, acquiring a patent for ownership over the &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/samsung-sues-apple-over-patent-for-emoticons/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/samsung-sues-apple-over-patent-for-emoticons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple patent for parental controls on texting</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-patent-for-parental-controls-on-texting/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-patent-for-parental-controls-on-texting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[163]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[814]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple content filtering technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple software patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental control application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental control for mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple's software patent for it's mobile phone giving parental control to filter out or remove inappropriate content in their children's text messages.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-patent-for-parental-controls-on-texting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/apple-patent-for-parental-controls-on-texting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMART PHONE PATENT ACTION SUITS MICROSOFT &#8211; Microsoft v Motorola</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/smart-phone-patent-action-suits-microsoft-microsoft-v-motorola/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/smart-phone-patent-action-suits-microsoft-microsoft-v-motorola/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple v HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple v Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google android open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade Commission complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft v Motola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft windows phone 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola v Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle v Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone patent infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft bringing action against Motorola the manufacturer of several Android based smart phones and filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission to prevent the importation of any infringing smart phones.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/smart-phone-patent-action-suits-microsoft-microsoft-v-motorola/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/smart-phone-patent-action-suits-microsoft-microsoft-v-motorola/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski v Kappos &#8211; software patents</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/bilski-v-kappos-software-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/bilski-v-kappos-software-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arrhythmia Research Technology Inc v Corazonix Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilski v Kappos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business method patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Associates International Inc v Altai Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond v Diehr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant v The Commissioner of Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM v Commissioner of Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine transformation test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anticipation continues to mount as commentators anxiously await the handing down by the US Supreme Court of it&#8217;s decision in Bilski v. Kappos,  heard in November 2009. There has been longstanding controversy and vigorous debate over the extent to which &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/bilski-v-kappos-software-patents/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/bilski-v-kappos-software-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Patents</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Council of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discoveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Committe Enquiry Into Gene Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/wordpress/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should exclusive property rights be granted in discoveries of gene sequences or are they properly regarded as 'inventions'? <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/hello-world/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

