<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pace Legal  Online Business &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacelegal.com.au/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacelegal.com.au</link>
	<description>Practical &#38; Legal Tips For Online Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Privacy Guidelines For Broadcasters 2011</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/new-privacy-guidelines-for-broadcasters-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/new-privacy-guidelines-for-broadcasters-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[. Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004]]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC v Lenah Games Meats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allworth v John Fairfax Proprietary Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial radio broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Radio Code of Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial television broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Television Industry Code of Practice 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition seclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Artists v Littler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Guidelines for Broadcasters 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy protections broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[[2007]]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has introduced new Privacy Guidelines for Broadcasters 2011. Privacy provisions are already reflected in broadcasting industry codes of practice which appear on the ACMA website and are specific to privacy. Codes of practice relating &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/new-privacy-guidelines-for-broadcasters-2011/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/new-privacy-guidelines-for-broadcasters-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greens To Introduce Workplace Bullying Laws</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/greens-to-introduce-workplace-bullying-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/greens-to-introduce-workplace-bullying-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 20:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridgette Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brodie Panlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brodie's Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton UTZ Luis Izzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complainant AU v Public Sector Agency [2011] VicPrivCom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberbullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Workplace Bullying Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupational health and safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preventing And Responding To Workplace Bullying Draft Code of Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy and bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Work Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worksafe australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Victoria&#8217;s Workplace Bullying Laws were introduced as part of a pledge to tackle serious workplace and other forms of bullying.  Queensland has recently adopted anti-bullying legislation whilst South Australia is close to adopting similar legislation. At a recent Ministerial Standing Committee &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/greens-to-introduce-workplace-bullying-laws/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/greens-to-introduce-workplace-bullying-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Facial Recognition Patent For iPhone</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial Recognition patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy facial recognition software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by Business Insider Apple has filed a patent for a facial recognition system for mobile devices. It is similar to the system in Android phones, however Apple is considering incorporating an option into the software which would recognize a number of faces, detected through the &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/apples-facial-recognition-patent-for-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Concerns Over Digital Photocopiers And Multi-Function Devices</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/privacy-concerns-over-digital-photocopiers-and-multi-function-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/privacy-concerns-over-digital-photocopiers-and-multi-function-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['Digital photocopiers: inadvertent collection and storage of personal information']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital photocopiers privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information privacy principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-function printers privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy act 1988 cth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perennial threat to privacy is increasing everyday with technological advances.   Businesses are beginning to appreciate the potential risks associated with the use of commercial photocopy machines and multi-function devices with the capability of retaining digital files of material on  internal &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/privacy-concerns-over-digital-photocopiers-and-multi-function-devices/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/privacy-concerns-over-digital-photocopiers-and-multi-function-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Solicitors From Hell &#8211; The Law Society v Kordowski [2011]</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/no-more-solicitors-from-hell-the-law-society-v-kordowski-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/no-more-solicitors-from-hell-the-law-society-v-kordowski-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Tagenhat in the case of  The Law Society v Kordowski issued injunctions requiring the Defendant, the publisher of the &#8220;Solicitors from Hell&#8221;, owned and operated by the Defendant since 2005 to take down the Website and refrain from publishing any similar website. The website was &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/no-more-solicitors-from-hell-the-law-society-v-kordowski-2011/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/no-more-solicitors-from-hell-the-law-society-v-kordowski-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commonwealth Statutory Cause of Action for Serious Invasion Of Privacy</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/commonwealth-statutory-cause-of-action-for-serious-invasion-of-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/commonwealth-statutory-cause-of-action-for-serious-invasion-of-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Law Reform Commission Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doe v Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Attorney General's Department Issues Paper Commonwealth Statutory Cause of Action for Serious Invasions of Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giller v Procopets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grosse v Purvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessie Porteus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenah Game Meats v Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort of privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) had recommended the introduction of a statutory cause of action for serious invasions of privacy. The ALRC&#8217;s recommendation are generally supported by both the Victorian Law Reform Commission and the New South Wales Law Reform Commission. The Issues &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/commonwealth-statutory-cause-of-action-for-serious-invasion-of-privacy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/commonwealth-statutory-cause-of-action-for-serious-invasion-of-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workplace Bullying Laws &amp; Privacy</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/workplace-bullying-laws-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/workplace-bullying-laws-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridgette Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying and victim confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton UTZ sexual harrassment claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complainant AU v Public Sector Agency [2011] VPrivCmr 03]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Izzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy and bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Victoria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised collection of information bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised disclosure of information bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised use of information bullying complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victorian privacy commissioner bullying policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying procedures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Victoria&#8217;s workplace bullying laws raise questions about the privacy rights of complainants within a complaints process requring alleged victims to disclose sensitive and sometimes traumatic information relating to workplace bullying.  An accusation of bullying can be potentially defamatory, especially under circumstances where confidentiality is &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/workplace-bullying-laws-privacy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/workplace-bullying-laws-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Can&#8217;t Face Being Your Facebook Friend &#8211; Piccolo v Paterson</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/plaintiffs-dont-have-to-be-facebook-friends-with-defendants/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/plaintiffs-dont-have-to-be-facebook-friends-with-defendants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 07:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook profile privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook terms of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McMillan v Hummingbird Speedway Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to befriend litigant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piccolo v paterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private email communications facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stored Communications Act. facebook public wall posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court has ruled that a Plaintiff does not have to comply with a Defendant's motion to hand over their Facebook profile in personal in civil litigation.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/plaintiffs-dont-have-to-be-facebook-friends-with-defendants/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/plaintiffs-dont-have-to-be-facebook-friends-with-defendants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Launch Location Features &#8211; A Time And A Place For Facebook Places</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-launch-location-features-a-time-and-a-place-for-facebook-places/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-launch-location-features-a-time-and-a-place-for-facebook-places/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 23:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Location Based Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Places Privacy Settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location based search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locational privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook has launched Facebook Places, adding location based services to users. A discussion of Facebook Places, geo-tagging and locational privacy.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-launch-location-features-a-time-and-a-place-for-facebook-places/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-launch-location-features-a-time-and-a-place-for-facebook-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Photos Stolen For Internet Dating Site</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photo theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook photos stolen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facemash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating website profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet dating websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet scraping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lovely-faces.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zuckerberg hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[match.com class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership of photos internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft of images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook photos have been stolen from Facebook to populate a prank internet dating site Lovely-Faces.com, demonstrating the vulnerability of user content uploaded to social media websites.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-photos-stolen-for-internet-dating-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

