<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pace Legal  Online Business &#187; Trademarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacelegal.com.au/category/trademarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacelegal.com.au</link>
	<description>Practical &#38; Legal Tips For Online Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Freeway Ricky Ross&#8217; Trademark Case</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-trademark-case/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-trademark-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Drug War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appropriation of name or likeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dillinger’s Inc. v. Jeffrey G Scalf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freeway Ricky Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran-Contra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personality rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapper Ricky Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second restatement of tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freeway Ricky Ross' lost his trademark infringement case against the Miami rapper Rick Ross,  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-trademark-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-trademark-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madonna Sued for Trademark Infringement</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/madonna-sued-for-trademark-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/madonna-sued-for-trademark-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A Triumph Inc v Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwachsberg Holdings v Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark searches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madonna has faced several lawsuits over the use of her Material Girl trademark in relation to teen clothing, personal care products and bath furnishing products. There are several companies with common law trademarks acquired through long term use of the mark including Rwachsberg Holdings and L.A. Triumph Inc.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/madonna-sued-for-trademark-infringement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/madonna-sued-for-trademark-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook trademarks the word &#8220;Face&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-trademarks-face/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-trademarks-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facecash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facetime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is now time to  face the fact that Facebook  are also about to trademark the first half of the word 'Facebook' by claiming exclusive rights over the word "face", a move which is being perceived as a tad  narcissistic, leading to some people labelling the brand 'Farcebook'. Zuckerberg will face a faceoff with a familiar face, the owner of FaceCash former Harvard classmate and contributor to Facebook Aaron Greenspan who is seeking to lodge an objection to the trademark.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-trademarks-face/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-trademarks-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark settlement &#8211; Google &amp; Groggle</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/trademark-google-groggle/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/trademark-google-groggle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinkle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groggle settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groggle, the location based alcohol comparison website, has reached a confidential settlement with Google over the trademark Groggle and changed it's name to Drinkle.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/trademark-google-groggle/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/trademark-google-groggle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook assert trademark infringement &#8211; Lamebook LLC v Facebook Inc</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-assert-trademark-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-assert-trademark-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanham Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade dress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lamebook's legal argument for declaratory judgement against Facebook - Lamebook LLC v Facebook Inc.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-assert-trademark-infringement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/facebook-assert-trademark-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COKE v PEPSICO &amp; SCHWEPPES &#8211; bottle wars trademark trouble in Sugarland</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/coke-v-pepsico-bottle-wars-trademark-trouble-in-sugarland/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/coke-v-pepsico-bottle-wars-trademark-trouble-in-sugarland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 06:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D shape trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2009] FCA 891]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola Co V All-Fect Distriubutors [1999] FCA 1721]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola v Pepsico & Schweppes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contour bottle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false and deceptive conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japanese IP High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Pty Ltd [1999] FCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHIM CTM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simply Family juices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugarland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCCC v Pepsico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade dress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coca-Cola's enforcement of it's 3D trademarks over it's juice bottles and caps, and it's iconic glass contour battle.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/coke-v-pepsico-bottle-wars-trademark-trouble-in-sugarland/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/coke-v-pepsico-bottle-wars-trademark-trouble-in-sugarland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapper Ricky Ross loses trademark case</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/rapper-ricky-ross-loses-trademark-case/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/rapper-ricky-ross-loses-trademark-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeway ricky ross v William Leonard Ross & Ors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ricky Ross loses trademark lawsuit against Rapper Ricky Ross <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/rapper-ricky-ross-loses-trademark-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/rapper-ricky-ross-loses-trademark-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Freeway&#8217; Ricky Ross sues for theft of his image</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-sues-for-theft-of-his-image/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-sues-for-theft-of-his-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misappropriation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Ross vs. Rick Ross lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricky "Freeway" Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teflon Don]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Leonard Roberts II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported by MiamiNewTimes, former drug dealer and prisoner  LA based Ricky &#8220;Freeway&#8221; Ross, has brought legal action against Miami Rapper Rick Ross (William Leonard Roberts II). He is  seeking monetary damages of $10 million dollars,  claiming he has been &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-sues-for-theft-of-his-image/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/freeway-ricky-ross-sues-for-theft-of-his-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Supreme Court Issues First Ruling on Legality of Keyword Advertising</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/canadian-supreme-court-issues-first-ruling-on-legality-of-keyword-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/canadian-supreme-court-issues-first-ruling-on-legality-of-keyword-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deceptive and misleading advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Career Training Institutions Agency v Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S7(b) Trade-Marks Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark keyword advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google adwords program has  given rise to legal controversy, provoking a wave of litigation across several countries. However, until recently no Canadian Court had addressed the legality of an advertiser using a competitor&#8217;s trade mark related keywords in terms of &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/canadian-supreme-court-issues-first-ruling-on-legality-of-keyword-advertising/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/canadian-supreme-court-issues-first-ruling-on-legality-of-keyword-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV &#8211; Attack on comparative advertising</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/l%e2%80%99oreal-sa-v-bellure-nv-attack-on-comparative-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/l%e2%80%99oreal-sa-v-bellure-nv-attack-on-comparative-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparative Advertising Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Court of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L'Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2010] EWCA Civ 535]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smell-a-like perfumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort of unfair competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unjust enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacelegal.com.au/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the advertising world competitors frequently make use of their competitor&#8217;s trademark, which is an entirely legitimate practice. Comparative advertising is encouraged as long as it is not unlawful or deceptive. It can serve to highlight the strengths or aspects &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/l%e2%80%99oreal-sa-v-bellure-nv-attack-on-comparative-advertising/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/l%e2%80%99oreal-sa-v-bellure-nv-attack-on-comparative-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

