Court refuses AutoDESK trademark protection for .dwg file extension

Autodesk Inc v Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation

In the case of Autodesk Inc v Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation,  the District Court for the Northern District Court of California has rejected Autodesk’s claim for a trademark over the file extension .dwg used in their AutoCAD software.

Autodesk sued Dassault Systems after Dassault produced software products including the file extension .dwg, marketing the software that it had legitimately reverse engineered from the Autodesk .dwg file format.   Autodesk’s claim for trademark infringement was based on their claim to a trademark mark in the letters ‘DWG’.  As Dassault contended,  competitors AutoCAD’s competitors save files in the .dwg format  to render those files interoperable with AutoCAD software products.

The Court ruled that the only purpose of file extensions was a functional one, namely  to designate or identify a particular file type.  The Court therefore refused to grant a trademark over something which was inherently functional, as this is not the province of trademark law.  To grant Autodesk a trademark over the file extension would effectively give them a monopoly over functional elements of their software products, resulting in computer programmers and computer users being hindered in being able to  designate file extensions as they see fit, without fear of being sued.

Related posts:

  1. Dior Trademark – An alluring sign for trademark lawyers
  2. Lion Nathan loses right to Barefoot Radler trademark in High Court
This entry was posted in Trademarks and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *