<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pace Legal  Online Business &#187; Defamation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacelegal.com.au/tag/defamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacelegal.com.au</link>
	<description>Practical &#38; Legal Tips For Online Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court Rules Blogger Is Not A Journalist</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/u-s-court-rules-blogger-is-not-a-journalist/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/u-s-court-rules-blogger-is-not-a-journalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actual malice defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all purpose public figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidential sources journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystal cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition media organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reporters privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free flow of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalist shield law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Padrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited public figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media shield law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times Co. v Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsididan finance group LLC v Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public figures defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shield law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit Accommodators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US defamation law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Oregon investment firm has sued blogger Crystal Cox for defamation in Obsidian Finance Group LLC v Cox. Cox describes herself as an investigative journalist/blogger and argued that any allegedly defamatory content she was accused of posting should be treated as &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/u-s-court-rules-blogger-is-not-a-journalist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/u-s-court-rules-blogger-is-not-a-journalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clayton UTZ Settle Sexual Harassment Claim</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/clayton-utz-settle-sexual-harassment-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/clayton-utz-settle-sexual-harassment-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridgette Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton UTZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton UTZ sexual harrassment claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harrassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=2083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clayton UTZ has reached a confidential settlement with a  former junior employee Solicitor  Bridgette Styles. Styles had  launched legal proceedings in a NSW Supreme Court claiming $200,000 in damages for sexual harrassment and defamation.   After the case was settled, Darryl McDonough, chief &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/clayton-utz-settle-sexual-harassment-claim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/clayton-utz-settle-sexual-harassment-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Twitter Forced To Identify Anonymous Users?</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/is-twitter-forced-identify-anonymous-users/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/is-twitter-forced-identify-anonymous-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous online speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous twitter users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asa Wahlquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australias first twitter defamation case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign privacy laws in US courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Posetti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy twitter users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proving authorship of tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Twitter be compelled to identify anonymous users? In a ruling that has implications for freedom of speech and privacy, Twitter has been compelled to surrender personal details of an anonymous Twitter user pursuant to California Court order <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/is-twitter-forced-identify-anonymous-users/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/is-twitter-forced-identify-anonymous-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Online Commentary And Defamation</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/anonymous-online-commentary-and-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/anonymous-online-commentary-and-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 03:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous online commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automattic Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacon v Just Host]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohen v Googe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth defamation law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dendrite-Cahill text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones v Gutnick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fab5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Daugherity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Tugendhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxon v Ottawa Publishing Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mywebsitetimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Yorks Times v Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwich Pharmaceutical Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief look at the issue of Anonymous online commentary, in particular as it relates to internet defamation.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/anonymous-online-commentary-and-defamation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/anonymous-online-commentary-and-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Pornography Sexting Case By Minor To Proceed</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL nude photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiild pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Pornography Protection Act 1995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation and distribution of child pornograpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doe v Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exgfpics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gillet v Procopets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagebeaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in pari delicto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional infliction of emotional stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion upon seclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Bingle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public disclosure of private facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republishing of nude photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submityourex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort of privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Doe v Peterson, a sexting case, the Defendant tried to argue that because Doe had broken the law by creating and distributing child porn images of herself, the law shouldn't assist her. In refusing to entertain this defence the court concluded  that Doe is considered a victim of the child porn statutes and therefore should not be denied the statutory protection  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/sexting-case-to-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFL AMBASSADORS OF SHAME AND BLAME ACT WITH DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/afl-ambassadors-of-shame-and-blame-act-with-diplomatic-immunity/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/afl-ambassadors-of-shame-and-blame-act-with-diplomatic-immunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Demetriou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breandan fevola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dickileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dikigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Hutchision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Hutchison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Bingle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Donaghue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respect and responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Lewin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zac posen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an article called &#8220;My Side of the Story&#8220;, a somewhat contrite and reflective young woman tells WHO magazine,  &#8220;all I really wanted was an apology&#8221;. She talks about how the father of her twins reacted when she told him &#8230; <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/afl-ambassadors-of-shame-and-blame-act-with-diplomatic-immunity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/afl-ambassadors-of-shame-and-blame-act-with-diplomatic-immunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dikileaks &#8211; Girl Ordered by Court To Destroy Photos</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-girl-ordered-by-court-to-destroy-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-girl-ordered-by-court-to-destroy-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL Players Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dikigate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Shane Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naked photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nude avenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zac posen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest instalment of Dikileaks (referred to here, here &#038; here), the 17 year old girl was ordered today by the Federal Court of Australia to destroy all photos images allegedly stolen by her from St Kilda player Sam Gilbert's computer.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-girl-ordered-by-court-to-destroy-photos/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-girl-ordered-by-court-to-destroy-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dikileaks Saints &amp; Sinners Law</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-saints-and-sinners-law/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-saints-and-sinners-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL Players Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Lovett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collingwood Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Standards Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nude avenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riewoldt photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s4 Crimes Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saint photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zac posen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story of the teenager at the centre of the Dikileaks scandal, a child  is more complex than many appreciate and the whispers are becoming louder as the facts finally start to surface.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-saints-and-sinners-law/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-saints-and-sinners-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dikileaks St Kilda Photo Scandal – What is the joke Nick?</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-what-is-the-joke-nick/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-what-is-the-joke-nick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL Players Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick lewin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nude avenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zac posen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick told us that the photo was "just a joke". 

The question in my mind in the Dikileaks case is what kind of joke is it?

What is funny about two guys standing next to one another naked with a condom? <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-what-is-the-joke-nick/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-what-is-the-joke-nick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dikileaks Court Case</title>
		<link>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-court-case/</link>
		<comments>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-court-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lara Bingle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick dal santo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Riewoldt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nude avenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Football Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda Photo scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised publication of images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zac posen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacelegal.com.au/?p=1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rigby Cooke Lawyers, acting on behalf of  St Kilda Football Club have posted a message on Ustream informing the girl at the centre of the Dikileaks scandal to be in Court at 10.30am.  <a href="http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-court-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pacelegal.com.au/dikileaks-court-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

