Pace Legal Online Business
Practical & Legal Tips For Online Traders
Skip to content
  • Home
  • COPYRIGHT LAW
    • What is copyright?
    • Ownership of copyright
    • Copyright lnfringement
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Licensing & assignment
    • Deeplinking
    • Hyperlinking
    • Framing
  • HOME
  • Organisations
  • DESIGNS LAW
  • About us
    • Ceo’s Message
    • History
    • Mission Statement
  • TRADEMARK LAW
    • What is a trademark?
    • Ownership
    • Trade mark searches
    • Trademark registration
    • Opposition Proceedings
    • Trademark disputes
    • Trademark management
    • Licensing & commercialisation
    • Trademarks on the Internet
  • INTERNET LAW
    • Domain name disputes
    • Domain names
  • News
  • ECOMMERCE
    • Contracts
    • Clickwrap/Browsewrap Agreements
    • Electronic payment systems
    • Consumer law
    • Jurisdiction
    • Media Law
      • Defamation
      • Intellectual Property
    • Internet privacy
    • Spam
  • Publications
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • IP COMMERCIALISATION
    • IP audits
    • Leveraging IP
  • Links
  • LICENSING & ASSIGNMENT

Tag Archives: libel tourism

← Older posts

Twitter defamation – Cairns v Modi [2010]

Posted on November 12, 2010 by admin

Cairns v Modi [2010] clearly established that tweets on Twitter can result in libel claims, and considered expert evidence on the distribution of Tweets and the likelihood followers actually read their tweets. Continue reading →

Posted in Online defamation, Twitter, Uncategorized | Tagged Al Amoudi v Brisard [2006] EWHC 1062 (QB), Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB), Chris Lance Cairns, Cricinfo, Defamation, defamatory publication online, defamatory tweet, Dr. Godfrey, expert evidence tweet distribution, forseeability of harm, Indian Premier League, internet defamation, Jameel v Dow Jones & Co [2005] QB 946, jurisdiction, Lalit Moda, libel tourism, Mardas v New York Times Company & Anor [2008], match fixing, Online defamation, prospect of vindication, publication, real and substantial tort, republication of defamatory tweet, service outside the jurisdiction, Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 QB 283, substantial publication, twitter defamation, Twitter.com | 2 Comments
← Older posts
  • Categories

    • .auDA
    • ACTA
    • Aerospace
    • Anti-competitive conduct
    • Bloggers
    • Bullying
    • civil procedure
    • Cloud Computing
    • Consumer Law
    • Copyright
    • Corporations Law
    • criminal law
    • Cybercime
    • Databases
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • Domain Names
    • DPP
    • e-law
    • ebay
    • eCommerce
    • Employment
    • Facebook
    • Google
    • Internet censorship
    • Internet Marketing
    • Law Reform
    • Media
    • Misappropriation
    • Mobile Phones
    • Online defamation
    • Patents
    • Privacy
    • Security
    • SEO
    • social media law
    • Spam
    • Sports Law
    • Telecommunications
    • Trade Practices
    • Trademarks
    • Twitter
    • Uncategorized
    • Whistleblowers
    • Wikileaks
Pace Legal Online Business
Proudly powered by WordPress.