Categories
- .auDA
- ACTA
- Aerospace
- Anti-competitive conduct
- Bloggers
- Bullying
- civil procedure
- Cloud Computing
- Consumer Law
- Copyright
- Corporations Law
- criminal law
- Cybercime
- Databases
- Domain Name Disputes
- Domain Names
- DPP
- e-law
- ebay
- eCommerce
- Employment
- Internet censorship
- Internet Marketing
- Law Reform
- Media
- Misappropriation
- Mobile Phones
- Online defamation
- Patents
- Privacy
- Security
- SEO
- social media law
- Spam
- Sports Law
- Telecommunications
- Trade Practices
- Trademarks
- Uncategorized
- Whistleblowers
- Wikileaks
Tag Archives: libel tourism
Twitter defamation – Cairns v Modi [2010]
Cairns v Modi [2010] clearly established that tweets on Twitter can result in libel claims, and considered expert evidence on the distribution of Tweets and the likelihood followers actually read their tweets. Continue reading
Posted in Online defamation, Twitter, Uncategorized
Tagged Al Amoudi v Brisard [2006] EWHC 1062 (QB), Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB), Chris Lance Cairns, Cricinfo, Defamation, defamatory publication online, defamatory tweet, Dr. Godfrey, expert evidence tweet distribution, forseeability of harm, Indian Premier League, internet defamation, Jameel v Dow Jones & Co [2005] QB 946, jurisdiction, Lalit Moda, libel tourism, Mardas v New York Times Company & Anor [2008], match fixing, Online defamation, prospect of vindication, publication, real and substantial tort, republication of defamatory tweet, service outside the jurisdiction, Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 QB 283, substantial publication, twitter defamation, Twitter.com
2 Comments